United States v. Hawley
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING CROSSMOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge.
[[Image here]]
In this civil action, the United States asserts that the defendant insurance agent and his company participated in a scheme to obtain federally reinsured crop insurance payments for persons not eligible for such benefits. Therefore, the United States has brought claims pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of the False Claims Act, as well as common-law claims of fraud and payment under mistake of fact. The United States and the defendants have filed…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. HawleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. HawleyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
- United States v. HawleyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2011
- United States v. HawleyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008