Legal Opinion

United States v. Hawley

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided April 3, 2008No. C 06-4087-MWBPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING CROSSMOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge.

[[Image here]]

In this civil action, the United States asserts that the defendant insurance agent and his company participated in a scheme to obtain federally reinsured crop insurance payments for persons not eligible for such benefits. Therefore, the United States has brought claims pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) of the False Claims Act, as well as common-law claims of fraud and payment under mistake of fact. The United States and the defendants have filed…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HawleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. HawleyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
  3. United States v. HawleyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2011
  4. United States v. HawleyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API