Legal Opinion

State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. Stamps

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 11, 2009No. CA 08-750PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARRY D. VAUGHT, Chief Judge.

Appellee Eda Stamps filed suit against appellant State Farm Automobile Insurance Company seeking underinsured motor-vehicle coverage. After a jury rendered a $135,000 verdict in her favor, the Sebastian County Circuit Court entered an order awarding Eda a statutory penalty and attorney’s fees. State Farm appeals from this order, arguing that the trial court erred in awarding the penalty and fees because the amount Eda recovered at trial was not within twenty percent of the amount she demanded or sought in her suit as required by Arkansas statute. We affirm.

In June…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. R.J. "Bob" Jones Excavating Contractor, Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, New JerseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. National Standard Insurance v. WestbrooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. City of Pine Bluff v. Southern States Police Benevolent Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. StampsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  2. FS Southbrooke LP v. Nationwide General Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2022
  3. RMS Warehouse 1315, LLC v. Owners Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API