Legal Opinion

Flood v. News and Courier Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 15, 1905PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Before Dantzéer, J., Charleston, Action by Augustus M. Flood against News and Courier Co. From order sustaining demurrer, plaintiff appeals. cite: It is libelous per se to publish a white man as a negroy 18 Fncy., 2 ed., 861, 866, 867, 906, 913; Cheves D, 194; Dudley, 303; 1 N. & McC., 184, 347; 4 McC., 317; 4 So. R., 71; 38 S. C, 533; Crim. Code, 293, 479, 480; Code, 1900, 2664, 0158, 1231; 1. Woods, 537; 3 Woods, 367; 119 Fed.

Read the full summary

Before Dantzéer, J., Charleston, Action by Augustus M. Flood against News and Courier Co. From order sustaining demurrer, plaintiff appeals. cite: It is libelous per se to publish a white man as a negroy 18 Fncy., 2 ed., 861, 866, 867, 906, 913; Cheves D, 194; Dudley, 303; 1 N. & McC., 184, 347; 4 McC., 317; 4 So. R., 71; 38 S. C, 533; Crim. Code, 293, 479, 480; Code, 1900, 2664, 0158, 1231; 1. Woods, 537; 3 Woods, 367; 119 Fed. R., 381; 163 U. S., 544; 100 U. S., 306; 163 U. S., 544; 16 S. C., 3,97. Amendments of U. S. Con. do not affect the questions 38 S. C., 533; 109 U. S-, 3; 100 U. S.,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Pope.

The appeal here involves the consideration of the complaint and the demurrer thereto. It will be necessary, therefore, to reproduce the complaint, which is, omitting' the caption, as follows:

“I. That the said defendant is a corporation .under the laws of the State of South Carolina.
“II. That this plaintiff is a white man of pure Caucasian blood, and is and at the time hereinafter mentioned was a citizen of the city of Charleston, county and State aforesaid, where he has always enjoyed the respect and confidence of his white…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. People, Ex Rel. King v. . GallagherNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Smith v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Spencer v. LooneySupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
  2. Black v. State Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  3. Wolfe v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Natchez Times Publishing Co. v. DuniganMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Stultz v. CousinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API