Miller v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
These appeals have been consolidated for the purpose of this opinion. See NRAP 3(b). We conclude that in each case the district court exceeded its statutory authority in imposing a jail term as a condition of mandatory probation. Each court also erred in sentencing each appellant to a range of prison terms that did not conform to the statutory requirement. We therefore vacate appellants’ sentences and remand.
FACTS
Kutscherousky v. State, Docket No. 29827
In August 1996, police arrested appellant Link Kutscherousky at a house along with the couple to whom the house belonged. In the house,…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Robert E. v. JUSTICE COURT OF RENO TP.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Creps v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Igbinovia v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
- Sandy v. Fifth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Koerschner v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Haney v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Daniels v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1999
- VALDEZ-JIMENEZ (JOSE) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE) C/W 76845Nevada Supreme Court · 2020
- VALDEZ-JIMENEZ (JOSE) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE) C/W 76845Nevada Supreme Court · 2020