Legal Opinion

State v. Munoz

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 2010No. 36542-2009PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to suppress. The central issue is whether the district court erred in believing the officer’s testimony during the suppression hearing, where that testimony was irreconcilable with the same officer’s testimony during the preliminary hearing. We hold that the credibility of witnesses is for the trial court to determine and uphold the judgment of the district court.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On July 5, 2005, Detective Jason Pietrzak of the Garden City Police Department and another detective drove in an unmarked car to a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. Gonzales, Jr.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. AndersenIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. Phillip James MorganIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. CookIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. HurstIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API