Legal Opinion

State v. Hurst

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 2011No. 37431PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Matthew Lee Hurst appeals from his conviction and sentence for lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen, Idaho Code § 18-1508. He asserts that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence, by relinquishing jurisdiction, and by denying his motion for further reduction of his sentence. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

After Hurst’s stepdaughter reported that Hurst had sexually molested her, an Ada County Sheriffs detective went to Hurst’s place of work to talk to him. The ensuing three and one-half-minute conversation between the two was audio recorded. The…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Allen Keith ClontzIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. ReillyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State v. KentIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. Tennison M. SilverIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API