Legal Opinion
United States v. 29.40 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Livingston
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 3, 1955No. Civ. A. 705-54PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTSHORNE, District Judge.
The issue here is as to the propriety of condemnation proceedings affecting defendants’ land taken by the United States Government 1 for the purpose of a military installation, as to the character of which the Secretary of the Army has formally claimed “privilege”. But it is stipulated by counsel for the purpose of the present motion, that the taking is for the sole purpose in fact of transmitting electronic impulses, at a height of not less than 50 feet above the land, called the “line-of-sight clearance surface”.
Defendants Samuel P. Matarazzo and Mary L.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stevens v. City of SalisburyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- United States v. Lilly Lind Brondum and Barthel P. Brondum, Owners of Tract No. J-923-ECourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. 4.43 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Tarrant CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1956
- In Re Condemnation by City of Philadelphia of Leasehold of Airportels, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Herring v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.