United States v. Lilly Lind Brondum and Barthel P. Brondum, Owners of Tract No. J-923-E
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Circuit Judge.
This appeal turns on the distinction between a clearance or obstruction easement and an avigation or flight easement. These terms are not jargon leading to fruitless semantics; not in condemnation proceedings, anyway. In condemnation proceedings they are useful tags to identify distinctive estates in property. Here, the district judge erred in interpreting a clearance easement as an avigation easement. 1 The district judge’s direction of the trial and his charges to the jury were based on the error, and as a consequence the easement granted was not the easement described…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. 4.43 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Tarrant CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1956
- United States v. 6.74 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- United States v. 64.88 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, and Charles F. ChubbCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Elvera v. McNamara v. American Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Sticklen v. KittleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- United States v. 3,317.39 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Jefferson County, Arkansas, and Earl MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- City of Charlotte v. SprattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- United States v. 101.88 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.