Legal Opinion

Governing Council of Pinoleville Indian Community v. Mendocino County

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 18, 1988No. C-87-4320 EFLPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

LYNCH, District Judge.

Plaintiff, an Indian tribal council (the “Council”), brings this motion for a preliminary injunction against the authorization and operation of an asphalt plant and a cement or concrete plant (the “plants”) on property owned by the Mayfield defendants and located within the boundaries of an Indian ranchería (the “Pinoleville Ranche-ría” or “Ranchería”). 1 The Council claims that one of its ordinances, which imposes a moratorium on new industrial uses on the Ranchería, preempts application of the County’s zoning authority, under which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Santa Rosa Band of Indians v. Kings CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. Arcamuzi v. Continental Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Duncan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  2. (PS) Hoggan v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. (PS) Hoggan v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (PS) Smith v. CountsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (PS) Smith v. CountsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API