Legal Opinion
Izatt v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 1983No. 13691PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISTLINE, Justice.
Following a hearing before the Idaho Commission for Pardons and Paroles on April 24, 1979, the appellant Charles Izatt, by a unanimous decision, was denied parole and was passed for further parole consideration to the end of his sentence. The appellant thereafter filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging that the actions of the Commission denied him due process.
On September 6, 1979, the Honorable Robert M. MaeConnell, Magistrate, dismissed the appellant’s petition, holding that the court had no authority to review an action of the Commission in refusing to release…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Downing v. JacobsIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Goff v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by21 opinions
- Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Balla v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1984
- Quinlan v. Idaho Commission for Pardons & ParoleIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Hays v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- Vittone v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.