Legal Opinion
Vittone v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided April 15, 1988No. 16918PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWANSTROM, Judge.
Mark Vittone was denied parole by the Idaho Pardons and Parole Commission after a hearing in October 1986. Vittone then filed a petition for habeas corpus alleging the commission’s actions were arbitrary and capricious, denying him due process. The district court denied the petition.
Vittone appeals, again raising the issues he argued before the district court. Other issues raised are whether I.C. § 20-223 creates a protected liberty interest, and whether a denial of parole should require a written statement of reasons. 1 For reasons explained below, we affirm the district…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Balla v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. HuffmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Hays v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- Mellinger v. Idaho Department of CorrectionsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. BrashierIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.