Legal Opinion
Furtick v. Medford Housing Authority
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 6, 1997No. Civil Action 95-12283-WGYPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
Stephen Furtick and his three children, Sanhita, Veronica, and Crystal (the “Fur-ticks”), commenced this action against the Medford Housing Authority (the “Authority”), the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), and the present secretary of HUD, Andrew M. Cuomo (“Cuomo”), in his official capacity. 1 The Furticks claim that the defendants’ policies, practices, and procedures have created and perpetuated racial discrimination within the federal Section 8 Existing Housing Program. 2 Specifically, the Furticks allege that 1) the residency…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Petricca v. City of GardnerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Langlois v. Abington Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Puerto Rico Public Housing Administration v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
- Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH v. Cobalt Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Lamanque v. Massachusetts Department of Employment & TrainingDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.