Legal Opinion

Norman Lloyd Petersen v. Ramsey Clark, Attorney General, Clark, Now John L. Mitchell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1969No. 23655_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

It appearing to this court that the judgment herein appealed (Petersen v. Clark, 285 F.Supp. 698 (N.D.Cal.1968)) denying the Government’s motion to dismiss, was rendered prior to and without knowledge of the Supreme Court’s decision in Clark v. Gabriel, 393 U.S. 256, 89 S.Ct. 424, 21 L.Ed.2d 418, decided December 16, 1968, in which that Court said:

“We find no constitutional objection to Congress’ thus requiring that assertion of a conscientious objector’s claim such as those advanced by ap-pellee be deferred until after induction, if that is the course he chooses, whereupon habeas corpus…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Falbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Clark v. GabrielSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Petersen v. ClarkDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1968

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Claud Michael KemberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. Francis L. McLain v. Selective Service Local Board No. 47, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  3. Rheingans v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. Bay Guardian Co. v. Chronical Publishing Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1970
  5. Rheingans v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API