Legal Opinion

Denman v. Warfield

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1898No. 2,586PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Fountain Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, C. J.

Appellee brought this action in the lower court against appellant by a complaint in three paragraphs upon three separate promissory notes, which are described in the complaint, and copies of the same filed therewith. To this complaint appellant filed an answer containing four paragraphs, the first 'of which is a general denial, the second a plea of pay*665ment, the third that the notes in suit were given without any consideration, and the fourth paragraph of answer sets up in detail a settlement between appellant and appellee’s decedent, by which the notes in suit were canceled. Appellee’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Drake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Board of Commissioners v. HuffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Miller v. Evansville & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis R. W. Co. v. O'BrienIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Salem-Bedford Stone Co. v. HobbsIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. IslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Prudential Insurance v. SullivanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Grabowski v. BenzsaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Grabowski v. BenzsaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Peterson v. StrubyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API