Aronoff v. United States Fire Insurance Co. of New York
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
The court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer. Upon a proper construction of the petition, it appears that the policy of insurance was in the possession and control of the plaintiffs, and was not’made accessible to the insurance company pr its agent fpr the purpose of indorsing thereon or attaching there*103to the alleged waiver of the provision against a change of title or possession by legal process. The plaintiffs are relying upon an alleged waiver of this condition; and under the language of the contract such waiver, in order to become effective, had to be indorsed thereon or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- New York Life Insurance v. PattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Hutson v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Lippman v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Golden v. National Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Great American Indemnity Co. v. Southern Feed Stores Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. of Connecticut v. FieldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- National Fire Insurance v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- I. T. Cohen v. The Pullman CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.