Oklahoma Cotton Growers Ass'n v. Groff
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, C.
The basic and general facts in this case are the same as in the cases of Oklahoma Cotton Growers’ Ass’n et al. v. Hooven, 134 Okla. 47, 272 Pac. 852, and Oklahoma Cotton Growers' Ass’n et al. v. Salyer, 134 Okla. 55, 272 Pac. 855. There are, however, certain facts and questions involved in the present case which did not enter into the cases above named.
Briefly stated, this was an action to recover on an injunction bond, because of damages sustained by the plaintiff by reason of 4he defendant, the plaintiff in error herein, having sued out and procured an injunction enjoining the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Arcambel v. WisemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1796
- McClintock v. ParishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Brown v. JonesNevada Supreme Court · 1870
- Uhrig v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sharp v. 251st Street Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Heiser v. WoodruffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Bowlin v. AlleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Callaway v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Womack v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.