Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Domer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1913No. 10428PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Hinkle, J., entered December 4, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, C. J.

Action by Edward Johnson against Anchor Oil Company, a corporation, S. P. Domer and Amelia E. Domer, his wife, to recover $825 alleged to have been paid to S. P. Domer for stock of the defendant corporation.

*678The complaint alleged that on or about July 2, 1907, the defendant S. P. Domer represented to the plaintiff that the stock of the defendant company was then worth fifteen cents per share; that it would, in less than six months, be worth one dollar per share; that the company was then producing and shipping oil from its wells in Virginia at the rate of one hundred and fifty barrels a day;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Cranford v. O'SheaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Suell v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. City of Renton v. DykemanWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Money v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ziomko v. Puget Sound Electric RailwayWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Pylate v. HadmanWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State v. IhanWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Bollin v. Galesburg Horse & Mule Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1934
  5. State v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API