Legal Opinion
City of Renton v. Dykeman
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1910No. 9127PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Robert H. Lindsay, Esq., judge pro tempore, entered January 10, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury awarding damages in condemnation proceedings.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
The city of Renton instituted a condemnation suit against appellants, seeking to acquire the right to take water from a creek flowing through appellants’ lands. Trial was had and verdict in the sum of one dollar each awarded appellants. They made a motion for a new trial, which was denied. The court, in denying appellants a new trial, incorporated his decision in the record, as follows :
“Superior Court, King Co., Wash.
“In the Matter of the Petition of the City of Renton. No. 67178.
“The court in denying the motions for a new trial in all the cases where Farrell, Kane & Stratton represented the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clark v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jensen v. LawrenceWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Johnson v. DomerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Ritter v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. Wenatchee Valley Holding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- City of Seattle v. Bingham Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.