Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Anderson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 13, 1977No. Misc. 77-161PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FLANNERY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the Federal Trade Commission’s petition for an order requiring respondents to appear, to testify, and to produce documents in a proceeding being conducted by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The petition to enforce the subpoenas duces tecum arose out of an administrative adjudicatory proceeding entitled Exxon Corp., et a 1. Docket No. 8934. The administrative complaint issued on July 18, 1973 alleges violations of § 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45 (1970 & Supp. V 1975). In sum, the complaint charges…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Exxon Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission Kerr-Mcgee Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission Union Carbide Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- In re Upjohn Co. Antibiotic Cleocin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
- United States v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Exxon Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.