Legal Opinion

Ari Karl Stern v. University of Osteopathic Medicine and Health Sciences

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2000No. 99-3312PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Prior to being admitted to the defendant university’s medical school, Ari Karl Stern notified the school that he had dyslexia, which has been defined as the “inability to read, spell, and write words, despite the ability to see and recognize letters,” Dor-land’s Illustrated Medical Dictionary 516 (28th ed.1994). At some point, Mr. Stern requested that the medical school accommodate his dyslexia by allowing him to supplement his answers on any multiple-choice tests required, either with an essay or with responses to oral questioning. Mr. Stern asserts that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Ellen Fjellestad v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. Frances Hankins v. The Gap, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Michael Argenyi v. Creighton UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. Natalie Slaughter v. Des Moines University College of Osteopathic MedicineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  3. Bitney v. Honolulu Police DepartmentHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Rossley v. Drake Univ.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2018
  5. Forbes v. ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY, INC.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API