Legal Opinion

Rollins v. City of Northglenn

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1984No. 82CA0307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERMAN, Judge.

In this declaratory judgment action, defendant appeals the trial court judgment in which it ordered that defendant furnish water and sewer connections to plaintiffs’ property for tap fees effective in 1969. We reverse.

On March 24, 1969, plaintiffs, Richard Rollins and Dalrie Berg, entered into a Utility Extension Policy Agreement (UEPA) with the City of Thornton (Thornton), which was drafted by the Thornton City Attorney after some “intense negotiating.” The primary purpose of this contract was to guarantee that Thornton would provide water and sewer service for plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perl-Mack Enterprises Co. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Lampley v. Celebrity Homes, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Sports Premiums, Inc. v. KaemmerColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Eisenhower Hospital Osteopathic v. TaylorColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Rosenthal v. SanduskyColorado Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Analytical Design & Construction Group, Inc. v. MurrayColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Trueman-Aspen Co. v. North Mill Investment Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API