Trueman-Aspen Co. v. North Mill Investment Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
METZGER, Judge.
The issue in this forcible entry and de-tainer action is whether a tenant’s negligent failure timely to exercise an option extending a lease warrants application of the doctrine of equitable intervention. We conclude that it does not and, therefore, affirm the summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Trueman-Aspen Company (Trueman), and against defendant, North Mill Investment Corporation, d/b/a Great Western Spirit Company (Great Western).
The facts are not in dispute. On April 5, 1977, Trueman leased to Great Western certain premises to be built in Aspen, Colorado, for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Buckley Bros. Motors, Inc. v. Gran Prix Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Reynolds-Penland Co. v. Hexter & LobelloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Koch v. H. & S. DEVELOPMENT CO.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1964
- McClellan v. AshleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
- I. X. L. Furniture & Carpet Installment House v. BeretsUtah Supreme Court · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United Properties Ltd. v. Walgreen Properties, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Suss Pontiac-GMC, Inc. v. BoddickerColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- United Properties Ltd. v. Walgreen Properties, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003