Legal Opinion
Analytical Design & Construction Group, Inc. v. Murray
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 25, 1984No. 83CA0565PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Robert and Sharron Murray were named defendants in a mechanic’s lien foreclosure action filed against their residence. Capitol Federal Savings and Loan Association (Capitol) provided the financing for the construction of the residence and was also named a defendant in the action. The Mur-rays cross-claimed against Capitol to recover damages allegedly resulting from Capitol’s breach of a commitment to provide the Murrays with a permanent loan when the construction of the residence was completed. Capitol cross-claimed against the Mur-rays to foreclose on a deed of trust given as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown-Marx Associates, Ltd. And Gary E. Smith v. Emigrant Savings Bank and Prudential Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Freddie Gold and Wife, Goldie Gold, Cross-Appellants v. National Savings Bank of the City of Albany, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Johnson v. American National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Millenson v. Department of HighwaysColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
- Sports Premiums, Inc. v. KaemmerColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Armstrong Business Services, Inc. v. AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Southland Bank v. a & a Drywall Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Concord Realty Co. v. Continental Funding Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Heller v. Lexton-Ancira Real Estate Fund, Ltd., 1972Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- GULF COAST REALTY v. Professional Real EstateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.