Legal Opinion

Byrne Organization, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 1, 1961No. 286-53; No. 287-53PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarAMORe, Judge

This suit was originally two actions brought by plaintiffs to recover a sum of money which plaintiffs allege is due them under separate contracts with defendant’s National Capital Sesquicentennial Commission. These actions were consolidated for purposes of trial with the consent of the parties and pursuant to the court’s order of October 19, 1955.

Plaintiffs seek a money judgment against the United States basing their claim alternatively upon either the terms of a written unexecuted contract or on the reasonable value of the services rendered under letters of intent dated October *58020, 1949. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Whiteside v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. GAY STREET CORPORATION OF BALTIMORE v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  5. Ship Construction & Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Roger Roy Larson and Joan Rosemary Larson, Debtors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Lillian Goldberg v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. California-Pacific Utilities Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  4. Penn-Ohio Steel Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Essen Mall Properties v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API