Legal Opinion

People v. Stebbins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. At approximately 2:00 a.m., two police officers observed defendant, who was noticeably intoxicated, exit a bar, stagger toward and “flop” into his vehicle, drive less than a block, and then park in the parking lot of a closed business. “The approach of occupants of a stopped or parked vehicle to request information is analyzed under the first tier of the De Bour hierarchy (see, People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 222-223) and need only be justified by an ‘articulable basis,’ meaning an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. HollmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. OcasioNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. PowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. People v. GradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Johnson v. New York State Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. ColeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. CINTRON, MICHAEL R., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API