Legal Opinion
New York Central R. Co. v. Bianc
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 10, 1919No. 374-376PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
250 U.S. 596 (1919)
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
v.
BIANC.
AMERICAN KNIFE COMPANY ET AL.
v.
SWEETING.
CLARK KNITTING COMPANY, INC., ET AL.
v.
VAUGHN.
Nos. 374-376.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 22, 23, 1919.
Decided November 10, 1919.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
Mr. Robert E. Whalen, with whom Mr. Frank V. Whiting was on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 374.
Mr. E.C. Aiken, Deputy Attorney General of the State of New York, with whom Mr. Charles D. Newton, Attorney General of the State of New York, was on…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Pitney.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Matter of Sweeting v. . American Knife Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- New York Cent. R. Co. v. Bianc. American Knife Co. v. Sweeting. Clark Knitting Co., Inc. v. VaughnSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Matter of Erickson v. . PreussNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
3Cited by14 opinions
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Madin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Clarence Rupert v. Todd Shipyards Corporation, a Corporation and Pacific Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Wright v. Purepac Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Case v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.