Legal Opinion

Thayer v. Bowler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1936No. 32,914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This was a workmen’s compensation case; the claimant recovered an award for total temporary disability; the employer has appealed. The principal question presented is whether the work in which claimant was engaged at the time of his injury is within the purview of the workmen’s compensation act.

There is no substantial controversy about the facts, which may be stated as follows: The employer, Bowler, is a painter by trade and is principally engaged in painting houses for others. A building and loan association usually employed him to paint…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Corpora v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Rush v. Empire Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Setter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Tierney ex rel. Tierney v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Covert v. John Morrell & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thorp v. Victory Cab Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  2. Tuggle v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Juergensen v. Isern Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API