Legal Opinion
Schenck v. County of Sonoma
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 26, 2011No. A129646PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DONDERO, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in an action challenging the approval of a project for development of a beverage distribution facility on grounds that the County of Sonoma failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.)1 before issuing a mitigated negative declaration. Plaintiff Beverly Schenck *953claims proper notice of the administrative proceedings was not given to public agencies and the findings of no significant impact on the environment are contrary to the evidence. We conclude that a single error in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sierra Club v. State Board of ForestryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- California Oak Foundation v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Rural Landowners Assn. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rialto Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of RialtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. v. State Lands CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Alliance of Concerned Citizens Organized for Responsible Dev. v. City of San Juan Bautista, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Alliance of Concerned Citizens v. City of San Juan BautistaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Farmland Protection Alliance v. County of YoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.