Legal Opinion

Richard v. Kaufman

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1942No. Civil Action No. 1361PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

Defendants filed motions to set aside the verdict and judgment thereon for plaintiff and to enter judgment in their favor or he granted a new trial.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for depreciation in the value of a farm owned by her in Carbon County, Pennsylvania, because of a diminution of water in a spring thereon as a result of blasting operations conducted by the defendants on neighboring property. The defendants denied that their blasting operations, which were incidental to the construction of a tunnel, were the cause of diminishing the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Jackson v. United States Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Baier v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Markowitz v. Pittsburg & Connellsville RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Baier Et Ux. v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bumbarger v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Opal v. Material Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  3. Harclerode v. Detwiler, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bedford County1947
  4. Bumbarger v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Dumbaugh v. De Felice & Son, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API