Legal Opinion

Buckman v. Tucker

California Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1937No. Sac. 5126PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

David Thompson, since deceased, on September 8, 1934, brought an action against appellant K. A. Buekman in a class A justice’s court in San Joaquin County to recover the sum of $439.72, plus interest from July 16, 1934, which sum was claimed to be due from Buekman to Thompson for money alleged to have been paid by Thompson for the use and benefit of Buekman. In that action Thompson attached certain moneys of Buekman. Subsequently that action proceeded to trial, resulting in a judgment for Thompson in the sum of $439.72 plus $8.95 costs. Buekman appealed to the superior court, but did not file…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Thomsen v. Culver City Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Levy v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Hier v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Plaza Farmers Union Warehouse & Elevator Co. v. TomlinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of MilhanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bond v. Farmers & Merchants National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. BechtelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Security Truck LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Munier v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API