Legal Opinion

Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Sparks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.

Appellee sued for and recovered damages in the sum of $428.32, alleged to have accrued by the negligence of appel lant in the transportation of certain goats from Uvalde, Tex., to Don Lnis, Ariz. There was a trial by jury resulting in a verdict and judgment for appellee in the sum mentioned.

The first and second assignments of error complain of exceptions being sustained to that part of the answer setting up a clause in the contract which provided that no suit should be sustained unless notice in writing of the loss or damage should be given within 90 days from the time that it occurred; it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Adams v. First Nat. Bank of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. VasbinderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Nast v. San Antonio, U. & G. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  5. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BrachtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API