Legal Opinion
Nast v. San Antonio, U. & G. Ry. Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided May 14, 1924No. 3815PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGerman, P. J.
Plaintiff in error, Nast, recovered a judgment in the district court of Nueces county, Tex., against defendant in error James C. Davis, Agent, for $1,060, the value of a trunk and its contents alleged to have been lost while being transported by the San Antonio, Uvalde & Gulf Railway Company and its connecting lines. This judgment was reversed and rendered by the Court of Civil Appeals in favor of defendant in error, except that plaintiff in error was permitted to recover the sum of $100. 240 S. W. 596.
At the time the trunk was shipped and lost, the line of road and the properties of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Sabine Tram Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Richmond & TifanyTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Eidson v. ReederTexas Supreme Court · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Transfer & Storage Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Basin Operating Co. v. Valley Steel Products Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Leader, Inc. v. Elder Mfg. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Baldwin v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Continental Bus System, Inc. v. AnselCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.