Legal Opinion

Heinen v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 5, 1997No. C8-97-224PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

Illinois Farmers Insurance Company (Farmers) argues in its appeal that Jamie Heinen, a named insured under his own automobile insurance policy, is not entitled to underinsured motorist coverage under his parents’ automobile insurance policy. Because respondent’s automobile insurance policy is closer to the risk, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

The parties agree that Heinen (1) received severe personal injuries while riding as a passenger in a non-owned automobile, (2) suffered damages attributable to his injuries that exceed $200,000, (3) after collecting the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Northstar Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Depositors Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Magnetic Data, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. National Family Insurance v. BuntonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Northland Insurance Co. v. Continental Western Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alticor, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2013
  2. Norton v. Tri-State Insurance Co. of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API