Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Snow

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 18, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.

This petition for mandamus was by the Attorney General, upon relation of two individuals, to a Justice of the Superior Court, who granted the alternative writ. See, pertaining to procedure, Hamlin, Attorney General v. Higgins, 102 Me., 510, 67 A., 625; Libby v. Water Company, 125 Me., 144, 131 A., 862.

Then came, in this order, return, answer, issue, hearing, decree, exceptions, and their certifications. R. S., Chap. 116, Sec. 18; Lawrence v. Richards, 111 Me., 95, 88 A., 92.

In the bill of exceptions, the first is rested definitely that refusal to award peremptory writ was a clear abuse of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. RichardsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
  2. Hamlin v. HigginsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
  3. Day v. BoothSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
  4. Libby v. York Shore Water Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burkett v. RobieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  2. Long v. Long, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API