Legal Opinion

Long v. Long

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County

Decided July 1, 1983No. 493 Civil 1981Published

1Opinion of the Court

COFFROTH, P.J.,

This case is here on defendant’s preliminary objections to plaintiffs, amended complaint in assumpsit and trespass1. We state and answer the issues raised as follows;

*136Part I, Demurrer To Count II

The demurrer states only the generality that Count II “fails to state a cause of action” without giving any reason why that is so, in violation of Civil Rule 1028(a) which states that:

“Preliminary objections shall state specifically the grounds relied on.”

Commonwealth v. Penner, 34 Somerset L. J. 364, 5 D.&C.3d 499 (1977); Spickler v. Lombardo (No. 3), 34 Somerset L. J. 131, 136 (1976);…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Sack v. FeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Penneys v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Barium Steel Corp. v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Charles R. Peterson, in No. 80-2662 v. Crown Financial Corporation, a Corporation, in No. 80-2663Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API