Legal Opinion

Libby v. York Shore Water Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 4, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

The overt phase of this case is that of nonconformity to statutable procedure in mandamus proceedings. This aspect will be seen against the history and the rule.

These petitioners own certain land in the town of York. They are desirous that their property have the use of water. The public utility whose main is beneath the traveled portion of the adjacent highway, has refused to provide that use.

Attention by the Public Utilities Commission never has been sought. No statute expressly confers jurisdiction on that commission in events of this nature, but its power to deal with such situations…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dorcourt Co. v. Great Northern Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  2. Chapman v. SnowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
  3. Burton v. ThompsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API