Legal Opinion

In Re Maxwell

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 9, 1985No. 1 CA-CIV 8038PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a court order mandating that appellant Crysta Beal Maxwell receive mental health treatment under A.R.S. § 36-540(B). Maxwell contests both the court’s finding that she is “gravely disabled” and the “treatment order” committing her to the Arizona State Hospital for a period “not to exceed 365 days.” We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 36-546.01.

Maxwell came to the attention of the authorities in October 1984 when her loud, disruptive behavior at the Yuma Airport resulted in questioning by a police officer. He reported in an application for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-4130Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  2. In Re BurchettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Matter No. MH 862-16-84Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. County Attorney, Pima County v. KaplanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re MH 2007-001236Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Service Action No. MH-1140-6-93.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person MH 91-00558Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. In Re Mh Xxxx-XxxxxxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API