Legal Opinion
McQueen v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 23, 2011No. 09 C 2048PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
GARY FEINERMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Patrick McQueen, Gail Russell, Michelle Shumaker, and Sharon Dancy, aviation police officers employed by the City of Chicago’s Department of Aviation (“DOA”), brought suit against several current and former DOA supervisors and the City of Chicago. Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint (Doc. 71) alleges the denial of equal employment opportunities under 42 U.S.C. § 1981; violations of their Fourteenth Amendment rights to equal protection and due process; and violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Cervantes v. Ardagh Grp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Taphia Williams v. Thomas DartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- United States v. Maricopa CountyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- Hale v. Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University School of MedicineDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2016
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.