Legal Opinion
Kalush v. Department of Human Rights Chief Legal Counsel
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 19, 1998No. 1-97-2771PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gordon
Margaret Kalush, the petitioner, filed an age discrimination charge with the Illinois Department of Human Rights (the Department) after being terminated by her employer, Deluxe Corporation (Deluxe). The Department conducted an investigation and dismissed petitioner’s charge, finding a lack of substantial evidence. That dismissal was affirmed by the chief legal counsel of the Department and the petitioner seeks judicial review of that order. 775 ILCS 5/7 — 101.1, 8 — 111(A)(1) (West 1996). On appeal, Kalush contends that the chief legal counsel abused her discretion by failing to investigate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Arthur S. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Nicholas A. CHIARAMONTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FASHION BED GROUP, INC., a DIVISION OF LEGGETT & PLATT, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Zaderaka v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Herzog v. Lexington TownshipIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Nischan v. Stratosphere Quality, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- McQueen v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Margaret Kalush v. Deluxe CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Deen v. LustigAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Illinois J. Livingston Co. v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.