Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles H. KEATING, Jr., Charles H. Keating, III, Defendants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 9, 1998No. 97-50049, 97-50056PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge WIGGINS; Concurrence by Judge KOZINSKI.
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
The government appeals a district court order granting defendants Charles H. Keat-ing, Jr. (“Keating”) and Charles H. Keating, III (“Keating III”) a new trial following their convictions on charges of racketeering, conspiracy, bank fraud, securities fraud, and wire fraud. Following an evidentiary hearing, the district court found that several jurors during the federal trial learned of and discussed Keating’s prior state court conviction. As a result, the court ordered a new trial on the ground of juror misconduct.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patton v. YountSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mu'Min v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- William Harold Mancuso, Petitioner-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Ana M. Olivarez, Respondent-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Francisco Jimenez Recio, United States of America v. Adrian Lopez-MezaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Phillips v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Meyer v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.