Legal Opinion

Weeks v. Cranmer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtFuller, J.

At the trial of this action now before us on rehearing the title to certain real property was quieted in plaintiff, but on appeal to this court the judgment was reversed as to the defendant John W. Cranmer on the ground that plaintiff’s ownership was not sufficiently established. Weeks v. Cranmer, 17 S. D. 173, 95 N. W. 875.

In support of the allegation that plaintiff, is the owner in fee and in actual possession of the premises, our attention is now specially directed for the first time to a judgment in ejectment in his favor, a writ of possession addressed to the sheriff commanding him to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coleman & Burden Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Day v. AlversonNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  3. Hill v. DraperNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Wilcox v. Leominster National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  5. Morton v. FolgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holthoff v. FreudenthalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
  2. King v. LaneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Joy v. Midland State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Morse v. PicklerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Yankton National Bank v. BensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API