Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Leominster National Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 1890PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Swift county, where the action was tried by Baxter, J.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

The action is under the statute to determine adverse claims to real estate. On and prior to February 23, 1886, A. G. and W. F. Wilcox each owned an undivided half of a tract of land of 640 acres, constituting one farm, including the land in controversy; and on that day said A. G. and this plaintiff, his wife, executed a deed which was intended to convey the entire farm to one Thornburgh, and he executed a deed of conveyance to plaintiff, the purpose of the two deeds being to vest in her title to the undivided half theretofore owned by A. G. By mistake of the scrivener who drew the deeds, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lamberton v. Merchants' National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  2. Dutton v. McReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Application of JuranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Ildvedsen v. First State Bank of BowbellsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Schumacher v. TrumanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Bank of Ada v. GulliksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Engenmoen v. LutroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API