Legal Opinion
Pfeffer v. Mark
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 26, 1999No. 1:98-cv-06771PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Steven Pfeffer (“Pfeffer”) filed this Complaint asserting three causes of action arising out of a commercial dispute he had with the defendants, Jonathan Mark (“Mark”) and Mark Athletic Ltd. (“Mark Athletic”). Pfeffer seeks an accounting, his unpaid salary and the repayment of a loan he allegedly made to Mark Athletic. The defendants now move, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), to dismiss the Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, the defendants’ motion is denied.
FACTS
For the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. NaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Laufer v. OstrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arista Technologies, Inc. v. Arthur D. Little Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2000