Legal Opinion
Arista Technologies, Inc. v. Arthur D. Little Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 28, 2000No. CV95-0789 ADSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
This case arose out of a dispute between Arista Technologies, Inc. (the “plaintiff’ or “Arista”) and Arthur D. Little Enterprises (a “defendant” or “ADLE”) regarding the licensing agreement of patented technology owned by ADLE. The technology in question, known as “video spot remover” (“VSR”) technology, permits video cassette recorders (“VCRs”) to skip past commercials in videotaped television programs when the videotapes are played back.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
The following facts are taken from the Amended Complaint. In March…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Credit Lyonnais Securities (Usa), Inc. v. Rafael Alcantara and Cavelba, S.A., Doing Business as Casa De Bolsa Rafael Alcantara V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alnwick v. European Micro Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Skrodzki v. MarcelloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Warck-Meister v. LowensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Bill-Jay Machine Tool Corp. v. Koster Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Furminator, Inc. v. Ontel Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.