Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thatcher v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1949No. 7178Published

1DissentPratt, Chief Justice

I am directing my dissent to that part of the prevailing opinion which discusses the first contention of plaintiffs.

The controversial section of our code reads as follows:

“Section 42-1-81, U. C. A. 1943:
“In all cases coming before the industrial commission in which attorneys have been employed, the commission is vested with full power to regulate and fix the fees of such attorneys.” (Italics added.)

This is an ill-considered hit of legislation that overlaps the powers of the judiciary. No doubt the legislature had in the back of its mind the thought that it would be of benefit to the applicant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. In Re Integration of the Nebraska State Bar Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. In Re Constitutionality of Chapter 315, Laws of 1943Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Ruckenbrod v. MullinsUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Revne v. Trade CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API