Legal Opinion

Revne v. Trade Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1948No. 7061PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrew Revne and the interpleaded plaintiffs are barbers maintaining single chair barber shops on the outskirts of the business districts of their respective communities where many of their clientele sought their services after working hours; and where presumably their expenses of maintaining their little shops were not as much as the shop located in the center of the business district.

Pursuant to our "Barbers Price and Hour Act," Chapter 16, Laws of Utah 1945, defendant "Utah State Barber Board" promulgated the following restrictions upon prices and hours of work for barber shops:

"Price…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herrin v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Arnold v. Board of Barber ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Hollingsworth v. State Board of Barber ExaminersIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  4. La Forge v. EllisOregon Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Stewart v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Salt Lake City v. International Ass'n of FirefightersUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Utah Farm Bureau Insurance Co. v. Utah Insurance Guaranty Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API