Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New York v. Huhn
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.
These two cases arose under the Georgia workmen’s compensation act. Both are death cases. Emil Huhn and Frank Beiger were killed in the same accident, and their eases are alike, with the exception that Huhn was driving the automobile which turned over, while Beiger was sitting on the front seat with him; so that the record in one case, with the exception stated, is like the record in the other case. The points of law involved in the two cases are substantially the same, except with reference to the wilful misconduct of Iiuhn as driver of the ill-fated car, which differs from the wilful…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball ClubsSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Flint River Steamboat Co. v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
- Evanhoff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1915
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Moore v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Walters v. BlackledgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Van Horn v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Department of Transportation v. Del-Cook Timber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.