Legal Opinion

McKnight v. City of Wichita

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 1910No. 16,419PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

In 1906, and since, McKnight was and has been the owner of a tract of about 138 acres of land in the city of Wichita. The tract was unplatted, and had been used as farm land, although McKnight had had it surveyed and mapped into residence and garden plats. No plat thereof had been recorded. A' widely meandering stream, called Chisholm creek, which ordinarily flowed only a small stream, but occasionally was deep, extended through this tract.

Early in 1906 the city, after proper proceedings, appointed appraisers to condemn a strip of this land…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. LaboreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Lake Koen Navigation, Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McLain Land & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. RoeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bales v. Wichita Midland Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Burke v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Wood v. Syracuse School District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Laptad v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API