Legal Opinion

People v. Hardin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2005No. 99696PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitzgerald

The defendant, Tommy O. Hardin, was represented at trial by an assistant public defender. He was represented in postconviction proceedings by another assistant public defender. His postconviction attorney argued that his trial attorney was ineffective. The sole issue in this case is whether the simple fact that both attorneys were employed by the Du Page County public defender’s office necessitated an inquiry by the circuit court of Du Page County into a potential conflict of interest. The appellate court refused to remand for such an inquiry and affirmed the dismissal of the defendant’s…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. People v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. GaultneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Frazier v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. CottoIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  3. People v. HernandezIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. CusterIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
  5. People v. ZareskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API