Legal Opinion

State v. Berry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 23, 1985No. 84-07122; CA A34929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for knowingly fishing with a gillnet in a closed season, a Class A misdemeanor. ORS 509.011. He alleges that the exclusion of evidence relating to his religious beliefs prevented him from presenting a defense based on the First Amendment. We affirm.

Defendant is a member of the Confederated Tribes of the Siletz Indians and also a leader of the Native American Church, Siletz and Warm Springs branches. Through his own and an expert witness’ testimony he offered evidence relating to specific religious practices and ceremonies of the Native American Church.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. State v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. State v. JenkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. O'Brien v. DuniganOregon Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. PruettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API